Know which add-ons are installed
Inventory AI browser add-ons and explain why broad page-reading permissions need review.
What this does—and does not—establish
A familiar name or marketplace badge does not establish safe behavior.
OX Security found two connected browser extensions sending ChatGPT and DeepSeek conversations to outsiders.
Source: OX SecurityDecember 30 is the first reviewed disclosure, not the attack’s start. Microsoft and Netskope later added findings.
The extensions offered an AI sidebar while requesting broad access to web pages.
OX SecurityThe add-ons read prompts and replies visible in ChatGPT and DeepSeek.
OX SecurityMicrosoft found collected chats and browsing information being sent to outside servers at regular intervals.
Microsoft Defender Security Research TeamEditorial analogy: a helpful-looking assistant beside your notebook quietly photocopies the pages. The notebook’s publisher does not have to be hacked for its contents to escape.
An analogy for the mechanism; not an additional claim about the incident.OX connected two extensions with over 900,000 reported downloads. Downloads are not confirmed victims. OX Security
Microsoft detected related activity across more than 20,000 enterprise tenants. Microsoft Defender Security Research Team
Tenant telemetry does not prove every organization lost the same data.
This does not establish a breach of OpenAI’s or DeepSeek’s servers.
Later sidebar versions changed behavior; they did not retain the earlier chat-theft code.
Editorial lesson: private information can leave through software surrounding an AI chat. Review the add-ons allowed to read those conversations, as well as the AI service itself.
People distributed the extensions; Microsoft also observed some agentic browsers downloading them automatically. Microsoft Defender Security Research Team
Netskope reports that Google removed one extension in January. It later returned with affiliate redirects; newer versions no longer contained chat-theft code. Netskope Threat Labs
Editorial mapping of browser controls. These controls are relevant, not evidence that a particular product would have prevented this campaign.
Inventory AI browser add-ons and explain why broad page-reading permissions need review.
A familiar name or marketplace badge does not establish safe behavior.
Allow approved extensions and reassess changes in permissions or behavior after updates.
An earlier clean version does not establish that future versions remain safe.
Monitor unusual outbound transfers and determine which conversations or other data may have left.
Blocking future transfers cannot recover data already copied.
Editorial connections to relevant controls, not evidence that a particular technology would have prevented this case. Each guide links to the security guidance behind its recommendations.
Explore the full AI security frameworkExplore more original accounts in the source report library ↗.
These are source-reported findings. An independent assessment, when available, is labeled explicitly.
01Read this case’s update history →
Reviewed Oct 1, 2026 · Editorial methodology · Structured data